You would have thought President Donald Trump might have left well enough alone. His tax package was passed – a huge political victory – and the economic figures have been strong.
But whatever the motivations – hubris, the mid-term elections later this year or maybe just a belief that he is on a roll – Trump has chosen to up the ante again. Tariffs on Chinese imports, with more in the works, threaten a tit-for-tat trade war. Meanwhile the president’s decision to target Amazon in a series of tweets – which continued on Tuesday – has added to the nervousness around the tech sector, already suffering from fallout in the Facebook controversy.
Stock markets responded predictably, taking a nasty dip on Monday. And while trading was better on Tuesday and Spotify launched successfully on the market, there is a nervous week to come. More trade measures against China are due to be unveiled and key jobs figures will give a pointer on interest rate trends.
When Trump got elected, there were fears of market turmoil. Since he took office, precisely the opposite has happened
Looking to the months ahead, the signs are that the extraordinarily calm and positive trend in the markets since Trump got elected are coming to an end. Volatility is back.
When Trump got elected, there were fears of market turmoil. Since he took office, precisely the opposite has happened. Trump tweeted 60 times between January 2017 and January 2018, on the general theme about how wonderfully the market was doing and how this showed his policies were making America great again.
For the first year of Trump’s presidency, everything on the economic front seemed to be going well, both in the US and internationally. It meant the president’s eccentricities, and the risks of his approach to trade in particular, were more or less ignored on Wall Street. His tweets became a sideshow.
Lawyer given jail sentence for lying to Mueller’s investigators
Trump says he will use military to protect US border with Mexico
No deal to legalise young Dreamer migrants, Trump vows
Pork and wine
Now, however, the honeymoon may be ending. Sabre-rattling on trade has now turned to reality. Following Trump’s recent decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminium imports, China retaliated at the weekend, listing $3 billion of US imports on which it would impose tariffs, including high-profile products such as pork and wine.
The US imposed further tariffs this week following a separate investigation into the alleged theft by China of intellectual property, relating to demands it puts on companies who invest in China to reveal details of their technology.
China, in turn, will react again, with speculation surrounding tariffs on the valuable soybean exports from the US, some 60 per cent of which go to the Chinese market.
This is how trade wars start, though we will have to see how events play out. Some negotiated solution may emerge with China – though it will surely now take time. And remember that while other countries like the EU, Canada and Mexico may get an initial waiver from the steel and aluminium tariffs, the US has said this is subject to further negotiations.
For his first year in office, everything in the economy was in Trump’s favour. Now, however, there are wider concerns
The risks of a damaging escalation here are obvious. In the short term, there could be some benefits to other countries from the US/China tensions. Irish pig producers will be among those hoping to benefit from greater Chinese business, as well as Australian wine merchants. But despite these silver linings, the dangers from an outbreak of wider international trade tensions are much greater for a small exporting country like Ireland than will be any sectoral opportunities.
Add this to the fallout from the Facebook saga and the overhang of possible greater regulation on the technology rock stars of the equity market and you have two significant specific concerns.
And Trump has entered the tech arena too, tweeting about Amazon, which he accused of paying little or no tax, and of using the US postal system “as their delivery boy” and “putting many thousands of retailers out of business”.
Stand back for a moment from the argument here and consider a US president using his office to attack an American company – and the uncertainty this creates about who could be next in the firing line.
Paul Donovan, global chief economist at UBS Wealth Management, said in a tweet yesterday: “Random tweets by a head of state against a company do not directly change the economic outlook. They may undermine the certainty and idea of rule of law which fosters innovation and promotes investment.” His point was that, by acting outside the normal legal or administrative process, the president – if he persists in this tactic – is introducing a new uncertainty into business life.
For his first year in office, everything in the economy was in Trump’s favour. Now, however, there are wider concerns about rising US interest rates and the high valuation the market has reached, even if many still argue that the underlying economy remains solid.
Investors are edgy and aren’t sure whether trading is just returning to more normal ups and downs, or whether more falls are imminent. Against this backdrop, they will no longer take Trump’s twitter feed as background noise. Given his record so far, this promises a bumpy ride.Tags: Amazon, Business, Canada, China, Cliff Taylor, Donald Trump, Eu, facebook, Ireland, Markets, Mexico, Paul Donovan, Trump presidency, UBS, United States